Thursday, January 5, 2012, 10:07 AM
Posted by Administrator
Posted by Administrator
I am considering filing two lawsuits. The first I will be researching at the pro se clinic at the federal courthouse nearest me in the coming week or two. This will be a direct constitutional challenge to Section 1713 of HR 1473, the "Wolf Rider."
I will be filing pro se, meaning I will be acting as my own attorney. This is solely because I cannot find an attorney to do the case pro bono. If an attorney comes along and wishes to help, I will of course accept such help.
The second lawsuit I am researching is against the producers and studio behind "The Grey." From what I understand from the trailers, this movie portrays wolves as stalking and killing humans. This is a gross violation of reality, and does in fact cause me harm because, by propagating a known-false myth of wolves, it fosters a stereotype held by an ignorant minority, and inspires them to further actions against wolves, and those actions harm me directly by depriving me of enjoyment of wolves in the wild (and I have a specific example as a wolf was shot and killed less than a quarter of a mile from my home, solely as a result of this negative and blatantly false stereotype about wolves.)
This will be an interesting case, and no, I do not expect to prevail. I still have to do the research to determine the caselaw behind my argument, but here is what I first jotted down as an initial draft of the essential argument:
Freedom of speech does not grant freedom from responsibility for the effects of such speech. For example, your freedom of speech does not shield you from the legal consequences of yelling "bomb" in a bank. This false statement creates fear under circumstances where such a statement has a reasonable basis to be believed, and if a true statement, means that those who hear such speech are in danger for their lives. It is no different when speech that a reasonable person might believe causes harm to the reputation of an entire species, and thus leads to the illegal killing of that animal by people who believe a false reputation propagated by a credible source of information.
Because "The Grey" either negligently or maliciously portrays wolves in a false and harmful light in support of a stereoype held by a minority of people who are ignorant of the true nature of wolves, and because it is portrayed thusly despite readily available information to the contrary, and because "The Grey" uses this false light to attract viewers who then come away with further reason to believe false stereotypes about wolves, and because "The Grey" has an audience of millions of viewers, each one potentially influenced or inspired to kill wolves in retribution for the perceived acts of violence falsely portrayed in "The Grey"; "The Grey" thus propagates a negative and false stereotype to the public at-large, contributing to violent acts against wolves and leading to killing of wolves. And because the killing of wolves deprives me of enjoyment of wolves in the wild, "The Grey" causes me harm by way of defamation of character of the wolf species.
There is a great deal of research I must do on this lawsuit of course. I need to find caselaw supporting my arguments, and alter it according to caselaw as necessary. My argument is based on my understanding of the law, but must be based at least largely on caselaw. There will almost be some precedent set in this case if it succeeds (which is why I don't feel it has much of a chance to succeed), but I believe I can put up a good argument that could possibly succeed in the right courtroom, possibly even the US Supreme Court (honestly, it would have to in order to set the kind of precedent needed to establish that a movie is responsible for harm caused by using stereotypes to draw an audience in.)
I wish to dedicate myself to these lawsuits. But to do so, I will need help. Currently, I cannot handle even the research because of health problems preventing me from even fully taking care of myself. I am trying to find a personal assistant. I also cannot afford to file and pursue these cases on my own. To do this right, I would need to at least pay for a personal secretary or assistant to write up and file things. Ideally, I'd like to have the assistance of a lawyer or legal entity to do most of the work because of my limitations. This can happen either by an organization offering to help pro bono (for free), or by my raising enough money to hire a firm (a far more expensive prospect.) I am hopeful that some organization would be willing to help me, especially given the attention this case will certainly draw (and which I will make sure is drawn to it through my skills and experience in public relations and getting attention.)

Calendar



